data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3a07/c3a07bc1c827f201ff843bf745bb7a93092ddc14" alt=""
In 2007, I wrote somewhat favorably of the SkyHouse project. Yet in retrospect I should have applied the precautionary principle. Two years later, Washington Avenue has a vacant corner where it previously had a corner-hugging building. While that building's preservation value was debatable, its urban form was superior to a vacant lot.
The DeVille situation is different because the best case (a cleared lot) is the same as the SkyHouse worst case. St. Louis is worthy of a better case.
3 comments:
I don't want to see historic preservation laws abused to save buildings that aren't really historic (I don't know if these were or not). But something must be done to insure demolition doesn't occur unless the new project is really going to be built, as vacant lots are a scourge on cities.
I love the Zane Williams building and always thought it was ripe for a loft rehab. Too bad the views are blighted by a sea of surface parking to the east, west and north.
I also wish St. Louis loft rehabs would retain the fire escapes. They add so much character to the buildings. In New York, fire escapes are appreciated a lot more.
Plant large trees in an orchard pattern and you can turn that into an urban oasis that people would love...cheap solution !!
Post a Comment