Readers may recall that in 2006, these blocks were targeted by the Forest Park Southeast Development Corporation during a wide round of demolition that took down over 30 buildings across the neighborhood. The Preservation Board approved demolition permits for one building on Norfolk and eight buildings on Vista.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7754a/7754a9fb0b4ca229a239ba6a1da345fe0baeb6f4" alt=""
While the large-scale infill project is welcome fulfillment of the promises that the Development Corporation made in support of demolition, there remains some bittersweet irony that the houses now proposed for construction are small, one-story homes like those rejected as unfit for housing needs. Make no mistake, though -- the size of the proposed infill is perfect for the area and the housing needs. That's why some of us opposed demolishing the frame shotgun houses that also could have served those needs.
The wide demolition in 2006 could lead to two other losses, one of which is the prominent two-story brick corner building at Newstead and Vista that recent was being rehabilitated. Getting remaining buildings listed in the National Register of Historic Places to attain historic rehab tax credits might be difficult, although certainly not impossible. The demolitions are tentative, though, and could be avoidable.
One problem for these specific block of Adams Grove are the cul-de-sac street closures on the western end. These closures are partly responsible for the decline of the building stock in this area. Placement of the closures at an unsightly and moribund stretch of Taylor Avenue has compounded the ill effects. The "dead ends" on Swan, Norfolk and Vista avenues attract enough criminal activity to deserve the term.
Here's the closure on Norfolk:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfb42/dfb428f08e50ca2052e3adf8e551b2a19228b858" alt=""
And this is Vista:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37154/3715419a955df3b8ed7395daa0e8a72cee814295" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f35f1/f35f173660abd35feb1dc7192b40a1d992e5897f" alt=""
1 comment:
Thanks for your thoughtful reflection on this proposed infill. I realize that it's a harder sell for new homeowners to buy in an area of vacancy, but it would be really nice to spare the area any more demolitions, especially when new construction could represent a 100% value-added equation.
I do remember the demolition wave in 2006, but thought most were denied. Do you have pictures of the demolished homes?
Post a Comment