data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1ac5/d1ac5e6431cd44bb562b9d8b2f1c1fa301d2a863" alt=""
Well, this outcome was far from certain back in 2005. At that time, the site was owned by the Pyramid Companies, which had purchased the Sears site and adjacent city-owned land as part of the Keystone Place project. Although the redevelopment and blighting ordinances for the Keystone Place project outlined mixed-use moderate-density infill on the Sears site and forbade any drive-through commercial, Pyramid suddenly announced a bizarre request for a zoning variance to allow the relocation of the McDonald's franchise across the street. (The sordid details can be read at Urban Review.)
Pyramid proposed moving McDonald's to a new drive-through restaurant on the Sears site and acquiring the McDonald's site for construction of a Grand South Senior Apartments. Keystone Place residents had bought expensive new homes from Pyramid with the assurance of the redevelopment ordinance protected them from fast food across the alley. Gravois Park residents and Alderman Craig Schmid (D-20th) also were riled by the attempt to breach a redevelopment law sought by Pyramid itself just ten years prior.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f275e/f275ecc8582029b5dda5a83968305eb137ba35d6" alt=""
What ensued was wonderful: neighborhood residents organized against the change to the existing ordinance, and were joined by supporters of sound urban planning from across the city, including young members of the Urban St. Louis Forum. Even though the boundary of his ward was the alley east of the Sears site, Alderman Schmid stood up for his constiuents' quality of life by opposing the proposed variance. Schmid attended a zoning adjustment hearing and spoke against the changes, eloquently explaining why development just ten feet outside of his ward affected his constituents' quality of life as much as anything ten feet inside. Alderwoman Jennifer Florida (D-15th), whose ward included the Sears site, chastised Schmid, but his remarks provided cover for her ultimate decision to not support the variance sought by Pyramid.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d15ca/d15cac4f46748bdb3bd9c986ee2e0f1cd24d7587" alt=""
5 comments:
A triumph. The Senior Apartments building needs suspended canopies over the ground floor retail.
That section of Grand is still not out of the woods yet; the venerable flower shop has turned into a cheap cellphone store, and the old Schnucks sits empty, still.
The Schnucks (National, actually) is occupied by a company about which I know nothing, but has workers onsite every day, and many times at night. The building looks unoccupied, but is definitely in use. It only looks vacant because there isn't any signage denoting its use or occupancy.
I wish the Int'l Institute hadn't closed itself off from the nabe and the street by slapping that crappy, cheap stucco onto what is, underneath, a very handsome building. Not very neighborly.
As for the former Netties, yeah, it has accrued some very ugly and, I believe, illegal signage. Oh, and the Asian market down the street illegally demo'd a building right next to its parking lot, and now the vacant lot is now a muddy, trash-strewn eyesore, and an illegal parking lot, at that. I called the City on them a few times, but it apparently hasn't had any affect. Shane or Jennifer, what is up with this lot?
It's in much better condition than before. We got rid of a drive thru and built on a vacant lot. I don't know really any other places where that has happened.
The next step would be Alderwoman Florida working with neighborhood associations, and all levels of government, to extend the street narrowing south to Chippewa. This will further spur the business district by promoting the pedestrian realm which should not end at Utah!
I agree, Doug. Having Grand go back to two lanes for half a mile is ridiculous. Grand south of Chippewa works so well as two lanes with a turn lane.
Post a Comment