We've Moved

Ecology of Absence now resides at www.preservationresearch.com. Please change your links and feeds.

Friday, April 27, 2007

Mayor Slay Supports Landbanking Tax Credit, Other Incentives

From the State of the City speech by Mayor Francis Slay:

I strongly believe that we have to be prepared to provide incentives to spur development in our more challenging neighborhoods. If the private sector was going to invest in those neighborhoods without assistance, it already would have done so. We must find ways to jump start that development.

There are three specific ideas that, working together, will do just that.

First, I have made passage of state legislation to establish a tax credit to assemble land for new development in low-income neighborhoods one of our highest legislative priorities.

Such a credit would make it much more likely that neighborhoods that cannot attract new investment on their own will see the same new life that trendier neighborhoods are already enjoying.

Second, we have set aside nearly $2-million dollars in Community Development Block Grant funds to spur neighborhood development in challenged neighborhoods in north St. Louis. Now that elections are over and all of you are firmly seated, Barb [Geisman] will be working with you to see that these funds are put towards uses that have long-term impact.

Third, I intend to work with you and President Reed to continue to use tax increment financing to attract private investment to those City neighborhoods where it is most needed and where TIF will work. And he and I will oppose any blanket policy that seeks to ban or restrict residential TIFs.


Doug Duckworth said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Doug Duckworth said...

Developing 75+ acres will not make neighborhoods attractive. It will destroy them. One cannot acquire that much land and expect to improve the neighborhood.

We are talking about a tract of land at least twice the size of Tillis Park.

And there could be several separate projects within the same area.

That will add nothing as first it must destroy what already exists.

Doug Duckworth said...

2 Million is really nothing when 29 is allocated for the City of St. Louis as CDBG entitlements.

View page 16 of the 2007 Action Plan.

Considering that North St. Louis is half of the City, I think they should be receiving more than 2 million, especially when historical underfunding, aka Team Four Plan, is a variable.

Also, these same CDBG funds are being issued for the LRA. We need to reform or dissolve the LRA and give these grants to local neighborhood associations or community groups like Old North St. Louis Restoration Group. Director Costello admitted they are the "eyes and ears." Why not give control to people who can get things done? Clearly the LRA is a failure.