We've Moved

Ecology of Absence now resides at www.preservationresearch.com. Please change your links and feeds.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Two Buildings on Southwest Avenue Threatened

In August, the owners of the historic Hill restaurant Favazza's applied to demolish two buildings to the west of the restaurant's building. These buildings are located at 5209 (right in the photograph above) and 5211-23 (left) Southwest Avenue. These are finely-detailed brick buildings that help define the street wall. Of course, the residential building at 5211-13 Southwest Avenue sports a fine storefront addition that extends the building to the sidewalk line. The original section appears on the 1903 Sanborn fire insurance map as one of the few brick buildings in the largely undeveloped area.

Although not in any historic district, the buildings are within the 10th Ward Preservation Review district. The city's Cultural Resources Office has denied the demolition permits. The owners of the buildings have appealed. The proposed new use is unknown to this writer.

The Preservation Board will consider the appeal at its monthly meeting on November 23 at 4:00 p.m. (The meeting takes place downtown at 1015 Locust Street, 12th floor.)

Citizens can testify on the matter at the meeting or send comments to:

Preservation Board c/o
Adonna Buford, Secretary
1015 Locust Street, Suite 1100
St. Louis, MO 63101

Alderman Joseph Vollmer
Board of Aldermen
Room 230
City Hall
1200 Market Street
St. Louis, MO 63103

4 comments:

STLgasm said...

WTF??? The preservation board will be hearing from me.

Michael R. Allen said...

I removed a comment about the restaurant's quality. No offense, but the focus here needs to be on the preservation issue.

Anonymous said...

Southwest St. Louis does not prioritize historic preservation. If you live in Southwest city, that's you.

Demolitions to remember:

The Arena for an office complex

Southtown Famous for a strip center

Art Deco condos for a Walgreens

Redbird Lanes for Walgreens

People in Southwest City would rather have the freedom to tear down and rebuild than have their options hemmed in by historic preservation.

They would likely say that none of the above, with the possible exception of the old Arena, should even be considered "historic".

Isn't it ironic? One of the most intact sections of St. Louis city doesn't prioritize historic preservation.

Doug Duckworth said...

I happen to like the restaurant and spend a lot of money in the area. I'll be there definitely.