We've Moved

Ecology of Absence now resides at www.preservationresearch.com. Please change your links and feeds.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Front-Addition Houses Part of the St. Louis Place Legacy

Planner Mark Johnson from Civitas has had a major hand in developing McEagle's plan for north St. Louis and western downtown. On Monday night at Central Baptist Church, Johnson used the phrase "legacy properties" to describe the historic buildings that McEagle is contemplating including in the project. I have no idea what criteria Johnson or McEagle has use to define "legacy property," but when I heard that phrase I started thinking about houses like the one showed above at right, located at 2552 North Market Street in St. Louis Place. (The house at left, at 2548 North Market, is quite a looker itself -- check out that entrance arch!)

Readers might recall last week's post "Brick Thieves Return to St. Louis Place" that showed how a house at 2543 Maiden Lane was damaged by criminals earlier this month. That house is just east and south of the ones shown above. All are highly visible from Jefferson Avenue.

Why do I think that the modest house at 2552 North Market is so interesting? Well, the house is one of a few remaining frame houses that have brick front additions. If that doesn't make sense, take a look at the rear of the house.

The rear is a one-story gabled frame home, with one room in front and a small addition at the back. This house dates to the 19th century. The front brick section, with one room on each of two floors, dates to a building permit issued on May 22, 1915. The cost of the addition was $500 to owner William Duerdick and his builder J. Scaumel. The result of the addition was a handsome, two-story brick front to match those of neighboring houses.

As St. Louis Place developed into a high-density, middle-class enclave, many early frame houses were absorbed into the emerging urban (brick) fabric through front additions. Simple frame houses could be concealed behind fronts as refined as those of any neighbors' houses. A new look and more space arrived, while the usable original house was retained instead of being wrecked. What great architectural economy for growing families on a budget!

The 1909 Sanborn fire insurance map shows the footprint of the little frame house before expansion. That house is numbered 1, while the brick two-story house at 2548 North Market is numbered 2 and the flounder house at 2543 Maiden Lane is numbered 3. Frame is colored yellow, and brick is pink.

One can see that this area was not typified by any one form of house or method of construction. There are even a few vacant lots. Architectural diversity like this as historically common as the more regular patterns found in other parts of the city.

Lest I throw out my appreciation without offering any idea for how a developer like McEagle could reuse a quirky "legacy property," I have a great example from another block in St. Louis Place. Here is the house at 1871 Madison Avenue, built first in the mid-19th century and given the brick front treatment in 1890. The style is different, but the form is the same.

The owners purchased this house from the Land Reutilization Authority, spent their own time and money on rehabilitation and ended up with a cozy homestead. The frame addition was in shambles, so they rebuilt it and finished it in earthen stucco. The roof on the frame section is a long-lasting metal roof, while the windows and doors are mostly recycled elements purchased at the ReStore and other places. A solar collector is on top of the flat roof of the brick front. Inside, the house makes great use of its small size with an open layout and a sleeping loft. The house uses stove heat in the winter, made possible by the small size.

While not historically accurate, the rehab of the house on Madison is inventive and green. The front-addition form is versatile and adds small-house options to the neighborhood for those who want to own a house but keep costs and house size down. the home on North Market Street is ripe for rehabilitation. The mansions of St. Louis Avenue tell one part of the St. Louis Place story, but that story is incomplete without the other parts. We can't preserve everything that is left, but we should ensure that we preserve an architectural cross-section of a living, economically diverse neighborhood -- so that we encourage that diversity to be part of the future as well as the past.


Anonymous said...

The home on Madison is fantastic. Hopefully creative reuse like this will be welcomed and encouraged in the plan for North St. Louis. Clearly one, two or even three large developers will not be able to complete the north side project. Individuals and rehabbers should have the opportunity to add to the project's success.

samizdat said...

Hmmm, it would seem that this house, and it's owners, contrary to what some posters at this and other STL urban/design online fora claim, did not find this house to be "functionally obsolete". Houses such as this have, and will continue to play an important role in housing for those who can't afford or don't want a 2K+ sq ft. dwelling to maintain. Families of various sizes live in 800 sq. ft. apts., why not in a 800 sq. ft. house with a basement? Functionality is in the eye of the beholder and the resident. Kudos to these citizens for such a competent and respectful rehab of what could have been a vacant lot, had some of our politicians had anything to with it's disposition. Love the BLUE standing-seam roof. OT; the wife and I are having some work done on our house (in stages, of course), and the cornice repair work was given to Hopmann Cornice, which has been in the same building on Benton (near the Sentient complex) since 1883 (!). Took a little tour and besides being amazed at the three large original skylights incorporated into the design, I found, hanging on the wall, a particularly interesting cast-iron tool. I couldn't figure out what it was until I saw an installisation of a standing seam roof: it was the crimping device used when installing standing-seam roofs. Probably lead and copper back in those days, though, not steel. Hopmann, BTW, is the only one of our contractors, so far, in which we are totally and completely satisfied. Fabricated a perfect match to a portion of the cornice profile which had rusted away. Oh, and the regletted repair to the top of the cornice.

samizdat said...

ps: The wife and I would love to take a tour of this little gem. pps: While at Hopmann paying off the last of the cornice work, the nice lady there, "PJ", showed me a greeting card featuring a front elevation drawing of the original facade: SWOOOON! ppps: FYI, I've been told that Sentient is also buying up property around the proposed Blairmont project area.

Anonymous said...

It is extremely interesting for me to read the post. Thanx for it. I like such topics and everything that is connected to them. BTW, try to add some images :).